that a provision in a Financial Institution Bond was unambiguous, and
applied to protect against loss resulting from extending credit based on a
good faith reliance on a corporate guaranty only where that Guaranty was
forged or altered. A copy of the opinion is attached.
A bank extended credit to a customer, which was secured by a corporate
guaranty. After the customer defaulted, the corporate guaranty also
failed. The bank obtained a judgment against the guarantor, but it was
The bank then sought recovery from its insurer under a Financial
Institution Bond, asserting that Insuring Agreement (E)(1) protected it
from a loss resulting from having extended credit based on its good faith
reliance on a corporate guaranty. The insurer refused to indemnify the
bank based on the qualifying language following (E)(1)(i), which it
claimed applied to all of Insuring Agreement (E)(1) and limited recovery
under Insuring Agreement (E)(1) to documents that contained a forged
signature, that were altered, or that were lost or stolen. The bank sued
alleging breach of the Financial Institution Bond and for breach of the
duty of good faith and fair dealing. Following cross-motions for summary
judgment, the district court found in favor of the insurer.
In upholding the ruling of the lower court, the United States Court of
Appeals for the Tenth Circuit noted that the issue revolved around the
meaning of the language in the bond and whether it was ambiguous. The
bond began with an introductory sentence, which stated: "The Underwriter .
. .agrees to indemnify the Insured for:" The bond then proceeds to set
out Insuring Agreements (A) through (F).
Insuring Agreement (E)(1) states as follows:
(E) Loss resulting directly from the Insured having, in good faith,
for its own account or for the account of others,
(1) acquired, sold or delivered, or given value, extended credit or
assumed liability, on the faith of, any original
* * *
(f) Corporate, partnership or personal Guarantee,
(g) Security Agreement,
(h) Instruction to a Federal Reserve Bank of the United States, or
(i) Statement of Uncertificated Security of any Federal Reserve Bank
of the United States
(i) bears a signature of any maker, drawer, issuer, endorser,
assignor, lessee, transfer agent, registrar, acceptor, surety, guarantor,
or of any person signing in any other capacity which is a Forgery, or
(ii) is altered, or
(iii) is lost or stolen[.]
In ruling in favor of the insurer, the appellate court found that Section
(E)(1) subsections (i)-(iii) unambiguously applied to (E)(1)(a)-(i), and
not just (E)(1)(i) as the bank claimed. Thus, it applied to (E)(1)(f)
under which the bank claimed to be entitled to indemnification. Because
there was no forgery, the appellate court held that the bank was not
entitled to indemnification.
The appellate court also held that there was no ambiguity created by the
fact the bond already included an Insuring Agreement (D), which provided
indemnification for forgeries and alterations. The court found that this
did not create an ambiguity as "Insuring Agreement (D) and Insuring
Agreement (E) cover[ed] different types of forgeries and alterations."
Ralph T. Wutscher
Kahrl Wutscher LLP
The Loop Center Building
105 W. Madison Street, 18th Floor
Chicago, Illinois 60602
Direct: (312) 551-9320
Fax: (312) 284-4751
Mobile: (312) 493-0874
NOTICE: We do not send unsolicited emails. If you received this email in
error, or if you wish to be removed from our update distribution list,
please simply reply to this email and state your intention. Thank you.
Our updates are available on the internet, in searchable format, at:
The information transmitted (including attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is intended only for the person(s) or entity/entities to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient(s) is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.
Notice Under U.S. Treasury Department Circular 230: To the extent that this e-mail communication and the attachment(s) hereto, if any, may contain written advise concerning or relating to a Federal (U.S.) tax issue, United States Treasury Department Regulations (Circular 230) require that we (and we do hereby) advise and disclose to you that, unless we expressly state otherwise in writing, such tax advise is not written or intended to be used, and cannot be used by you (the addressee) or other person(s), for purposes of (1) avoiding penalties imposed under the United States Internal Revenue Code or (2) promoting, marketing or recommending to any other person(s) the (or any of the) transaction(s) or matter(s) addressed, discussed or referenced herein. Each taxpayer should seek advice from an independent tax advisor with respect to any Federal tax issue(s), transaction(s) or matter(s) addressed, discussed or referenced herein based upon his, her or its particular circumstances.